What Vaccine Makers Aren't Telling Pet Owners

If Vaccine Immunity Really Lasts for Years, Why Annual Boosters?

Chesapeake Bay Retriever - Marie Thomas
Chesapeake Bay Retriever - Marie Thomas
Makers of pet vaccines conceal the true immunity expiration dates from pet owners, who are told only the recommended expiration dates to promote earlier re-vaccination.

No one is privy to the real immunity expiration information except the “medical experts”, veterinarians who pass along only the ‘recommended re-vaccination dates’.

Pet owners receive notices for too-frequent vaccinations that are unnecessary, expensive, and can cause auto-immune reactions sometimes resulting in illness or death of their pet. The public has a right to know the truth so they can make informed decisions.

In February of 2005, Kris Christine, a pet owner from Alna, Maine, testified before the Agriculture, Conservation, and Forest Committee to request them to pass LD429 – An Act to Require Veterinarians to Provide Vaccine Disclosure Forms.

It's a Medical Money Problem

William Campbell Douglass M.D., says “Millions are lining up every year to avoid illnesses we have almost no chance of catching… Vaccinations have become a billion-dollar money game… Drug companies use scare tactics to convince people to be injected with junk concoctions that… are causing far more health problems than they are preventing.”

Is there any reason to think that it’s any different with pets—or even more prevalent?

Vaccine Immunity Lasts Longer

A November 2007 article in the New England Journal of Medicine indicated that booster shots were often unnecessary because immunity lasted far longer than previously thought. The calculated half-life for smallpox antibodies averaged 92 years. Yet Fido and Petunia are dragged to the vet for baby shots, and then for a lifetime of annual boosters.

The American Animal Hospital Association (AAHA) 2003 Canine Vaccine Guidelines, Recommendations, and Supporting Literature, a report available only to veterinarians, not lay people, states on page 18, that ”We now know that booster injections are of no value in dogs already immune, and immunity from distemper and vaccinations last for a minimum of 7 years based on challenge studies, and up to 15 years (a lifetime) based on antibody titer.” Thus nationally accepted science indicates that animals are protected for a minimum of 7-15 years after vaccination with distemper and other specific, tested vaccines.

Serious Side Effects

Other side-effects in cats, given by the AAHA, are dramatic increases in hyperthyroidism and cancerous tumors between the shoulder blades (where vaccines are given). Over-vaccination also frequently results in itchy skin reactions vets routinely diagnose as ‘flea allergy’, prescribing cortisone. This may provide temporary relief, while multiple cortisone shots result in weight-gain, thyroid instability from hyper- to hypothyroid, and severely shortened life spans. Today, vets often say the average cat in their practice ‘lives to age 12 or so’, a hard thing to hear when healthy cats should be living to 20 years old.

A Wall Street Journal article in July of 2002, entitled Vaccinations can have adverse effects, studies show, by Rhonda L. Rundle states: “In a policy statement last year, the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) acknowledged that the practice of annual vaccinations is based on ‘historical precedent’ and ‘not on scientific data.’ ”

The AVMA’s Principles of Vaccination states “..revaccination frequency recommendations found on many vaccine labels … does not resolve the question about… maximum duration of immunity [Page 2] and.. may fail to adequately inform practitioners about optimal use of product…[Page 4] .” Colorado State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital states: “…booster recommendations for vaccines other than rabies virus have been determined arbitrarily by manufacturers.”

What Experts Do

Dr. Ronald Schultz, Chairman of the Board of Pathological Sciences at the U. of Wisconsin School of Veterinary Medicine, and a researcher at the forefront of vaccine research, is quoted as saying “My own pets are vaccinated once or twice as pups and kittens, then never again, except for rabies.” But the pet-owning public must be given this information, perhaps kept from them because it continues their flow of revenue.

Resource: Mercola Pet web site Articles.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/introducing-mercola-healthy-pets.aspx

Like this article? Read my other articles.

Marie Thomas, Marie Thomas

Marie Thomas - Marie Thomas (RieT) is an author in multiple genres, with 18 years in technical writing, and freelance work in science, biographical, and ...

rss
Advertisement

Comments

Feb 8, 2010 1:15 PM
Guest :
In over 30 years of dog ownership, I have never had more than puppy shots done, as I never believed they were needed yearly. So good to hear others now saying it!
Feb 8, 2010 2:56 PM
Guest :
fabulous!!!! thank you!!!
Mar 13, 2010 7:19 PM
Guest :
Great article - we have to spread the word to ensure other pet owners are warned about this scam.

I've been lobbying on this issue in Australia - here's a link to a recent article I've written summarising the topic titled "Too many needles ! Unnecessary vaccination exposed"
http://users.on.net/~peter.hart/Too_many_needles.pdf

For further information, here are links to some fully-referenced papers I have prepared:

- "Is over-vaccination harming our pets? Are vets making our pets sick?" (13 April 2009). (This fully-referenced report was tabled at a special meeting of senior scientific staff convened by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (i.e. the government regulator) on 15 April 2009. The meeting was convened in response to my concerns about the problem of unnecessary vaccination of pets.)
http://users.on.net/~peter.hart/Is_%20over-vaccination_harming_our_pets.p df

- "Over-vaccination of pets – an unethical practice" (16 June 2009): This fully-referenced paper is a summary of my previous report with additional information:
http://users.on.net/~peter.hart/Over-vaccination_of_pets_-_an_unethical_ practice.pdf

Submissions were recently invited on the (Australian) National Scheme for Assessment, Registration and Control of Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Discussion paper. I made a submission titled “Unnecessary and possibly harmful, use of companion animal vaccines”. (February 2010). My submission has been published on the Australian Government’s Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry website: http://www.daff.gov.au/agriculture-food/food/regulation-safety/ag-vet-chem icals/domestic-policy/psic/responses-to-discussion-paper/hart,_elizabeth

Pet owners have been ripped off for years. More importantly, animals have been needlessly put at risk of adverse reactions and other longer term health problems due to unnecessary vaccination. It’s time the veterinary profession was brought to account for withholding critical information from pet owners.
3 Comments
Helpful?
Advertisement
Advertisement